It seems we are not alone in our assessment of Louis Freeh’s
report on the Sandusky affair and its fallout for Penn State. In today’s Philadelphia Inquirer, Joseph N.
DiStefano, a journalist for the Inquirer, writes an article
noting the fact that there are some folks who are not sold on Freeh’s
report.
In another article
last November, DiStefano wrote that that in spite of disclaimers about any
prior connection with Penn State, it seems Freeh indeed made an awful lot of
money working for a bank [MBNA] that paid Penn State’s Alumni Association $30
million between 1998 and 2006 for their mailing lists and some help with marketing
their credit cards to the alumni. Additional
moneys were paid annually for exclusivity rights and to keep Joe Paterno in the
MBNA fold as well. In 2006 Freeh left
MBNA just as it was acquired by Bank of America, and Freeh cashed out his stock
to the tune of $20 million.
Freeh’s position with
MBNA was as General Counsel and as such had little to do with the marketing of
Credit Cards, but he certainly would have reviewed contracts, and amended or
approved them as necessary.
DiStefano also provides a link to a very good and longtime
columnist for the Delaware County Daily Times, Gil Spencer. Spencer wrote, in an article yesterday titled
“FreehReport is full of assumptions”, essentially along the same lines as our
previous post. There are assumptions and
assertions in Freeh’s report that are simply not supported by the evidence he
presents. Spencer finds McQueary much
more culpable than anyone else for not reporting the ”crime” he witnessed, and
for not reporting it to Paterno, and later to Schultz and Curley as a rape, or
sexual molestation. Indeed, McQueary’s
father, a medical professional, would have known the law required such a crime to
be reported and he did nothing. He
obviously did not counsel his son to go to the police. One wonders just what young McQueary actually told his dad. Add that to the fact that Paterno, Curley and Schultz all testified that what McQueary reported was something far less serious than what he was saying to the Grand Jury and to the Sandusky trial jury.
How could Freeh not see this commonality in what McQueary said then, and the contextual actions and eventual memories of the men to whom he reported it?
The more this gets looked at, the more McQueary’s actions
and inactions come under scrutiny and they are not passing that scrutiny. Yet Freeh uses McQueary extensively to
provide the underpinnings of his condemnation of Curley, Schultz, Spanier and
Paterno.
Spencer writes, “The fact is, before this scandal broke, I
couldn’t give two serious craps about Penn State or Joe Paterno. I didn’t follow or care about his football
program and I still don’t. But lynch
mobs offend me and so do people who leap to conclusions for the purpose of
engaging in character assassination.”
Indeed there has been a rush to judgment, started first by
the Trustees last fall, and picked up almost immediately by sportswriters and
newscasters around the country. It seems
to be the prevailing sport among them, to see someone who is idolized for all
the good he has done in his life and because he is better than they are, they
must tear him down, find fault, regardless of its validity, and believe the
worst about someone the bulk of the country thought was a good man who had done
good things for a lot of people, over a long lifetime. That is the kind of person they like to go
after…with that “lynch mob” mentality.
The Paterno family reported today that it would conduct its
own investigation and asked the Freeh investigators to preserve their notes and
evidence and make it available.
Others, like DiStefano and Spenser, are starting to see
through the Freeh report. That is a good
thing.
Please read Spencer’scolumn. It is quite good. It is an exemplar of the good writing and
good sense that marks Gil Spencer’s reputation.
He should watch out. That marks him as a target for the “lynch
mob.”
GettysBLOG
We support the Roadmap to Reform!
“Be steadfast in your anger, be sure in your convictions, be moved by the right and certainty that abuse of power must be defeated at every turn; uphold Liberty as the just reward of a watchful people, and let not those who have infringed upon that Liberty steal it away from you. Never loosen your grip on Liberty!" -- GettysBLOG
“Legislation without representation is tyranny.” -- GettysBLOG
Remember in May and November! Before you vote, GettysBLOG!
Copyright © 2005-2012: GettysBLOG; All Rights Reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment